Readers
Speak:
Survey of Uses and Abuses of the Internet
Halvor Moorshead reports on the results of an extensive
survey of Family Chronicle readers on their experiences with
the Internet.
IN
THE FIFTH ANNIVERSARY issue of Family Chronicle, we
published the results of a reader survey. We found the answers
fascinating and useful.
As this issue is
largely devoted to using the Internet for genealogy, we thought
we would do a second survey, specifically on how readers are
using the Internet. The survey was e-mailed on 20 September,
only a week before going to press, in order that the findings
would be as up-to-date as possible. We received a healthy
29.5 percent response, considered very respectable for Internet
surveys.
We should make
it clear that the results are likely biased towards those
who are heavy users of the Internet but previous surveys have
shown that the majority of Family Chronicle readers
are major Internet users. Surveys were sent to different readers
than those of the first questionnaire, however we were able
to make comparisons between the two groups when the same question
was asked and the results were virtually identical.
The answers were
quite anonymous - we have no way of knowing who responded
or the identity of individual respondents. A handful of the
questionnaires included questions for us: of course we are
unable to reply due the anonymity.
 |
"How
people use the various facilities of the Internet." |
Heavy Users
There is no doubt that Family Chronicle readers - and we do
not believe that they are that different from most other genealogists
- are making massive use of the Internet. Forty percent tell
us that they use the Internet at least daily for conducting
genealogical research and a staggering 86 percent use it at
least weekly! What is more, 78 percent claim that they are online
for at least an hour a day; only three percent use it less than
an hour a week. Connection
speed
Fifty-nine percent of respondents use a 56K modem, while nine
percent are still on a 28K connection. Sixteen percent have
high-speed connections, while 15 percent are not sure of their
connection speed.
The most popular
search engines were Google and Yahoo, with the once-favorite
AltaVista a distant third.
Microsoft seems
to have won the battle of the browsers: 70 percent use Internet
Explorer compared to 31 percent for Netscape Navigator and
20 percent for AOL.
Proper
Sourcing
One of the major criticisms of conducting research on the
Internet is that the information is virtually all from compiled
sources (i.e. the records are not original). Some census records
and the Ellis Island records do allow you to examine images
of the originals but the vast majority of information is really
indexes of records.
We asked readers
if they tried to confirm the information found on the Internet.
It appears people are well aware of the need to confirm data
and 91 percent claim that they do try to confirm the information
they have discovered.
Forty-two percent
tell us that they use the "Connect to the Internet" feature
in their genealogy software.
People are certainly
trading a lot of information. Forty-nine percent have sent
GEDCOMS, 68 percent have sent photographs, 21 percent have
sent pdf files, while 74 percent have sent text documents.
Overall, 92 percent have sent genealogical data over the Internet.
Most respondents
seem comfortable with ordering over the Internet. Sixty-two
percent have ordered genealogical products online, while a
further 27 percent would order if there was something they
wanted! Only 15 percent are uncomfortable buying products
online.
When we asked for
general comments, several respondents expressed concern over
errors in the data. One reader was particularly expressive
about careless information:
My
biggest concern is all the mistakes. Someone else has put
some of my personal information on (not authorized) and I
cannot remove it - [the site allows] only the person that
put it on to remove it! I can't contact them because the e-mail
address is no longer valid. This is not right and something
needs to be done to address it.
Those
"Family Tree Maker" CDs are the worst as there is no way to
remove the incorrect data and they continue to spew out the
wrong data around the world, along with the horrific advertising
"Complete your family data fast - buy these CDs." Of course
the people selling the CDs do nothing to verify the data.
To me this is the biggest fraud being perpetrated on the genealogy
world. People are buying them hand over fist because they
are too lazy to do the research!
 |
"How
respondents rate the various subscription database services." |
Other comments tried to put Internet research into perspective:
The Internet really has to be used in its
appropriate place in research. It is great for obtaining information
about where and how to find records. Some index information
is valuable. But the emphasis on the Internet is way too heavy
in most genealogy publications these days (a whole issue,
in some cases - what a waste!!). Family trees on the Internet
are as often wishful thinking. Genealogy done solely on the
'Net lacks many pieces of data which flesh out a good family
history.
I hope your publication continues to offer
in-depth information about good resources - land records,
wills, military records, etc., with the understanding that
some guidance may be found on the net, but that real genealogy
is still a paper-microfilm-microfiche-read everything about
the person, their times, their friends, relatives, neighbors-kind
of project.
 |
"Readers
are spending a lot of time conducting their research
on the Internet." |
Another subscriber added:
I think the Internet is helpful for some things.
However, there is so much erroneous material posted that I
really don't use it very much anymore. I've gone back to the
more conventional [methods] of research. I always document
everything from original sources if I possibly can. I have
a great concern about all the beginning researchers that think
all they need to do is find it on the Internet!
 |
"The
major free databases are clearly the most popular with
readers." |
 |
"How
the survey respondents rated the most popular newsletters." |
Despite the limitations, people are finding the Internet a great
help.
I've been researching for over 18 years so
approach the web/Internet as a tool, not the gospel truth.
It has provided excellent networking for me, with folks I'd
not have otherwise met because many on the net are not serious
researchers, but those who've created web pages or submitted
historical data for a local web page and provided clues I
can use and then verify. In one year I've found nine new distant
cousins this way. Some do genealogy; some just collect and
are interested. But I've been able to put bits and pieces
of info together that in the past eluded me because those
with the info were not in the world of genealogy magazines,
placing ads or joining local societies and placing queries.
Many of the readers surveyed made kind comments
about Family Chronicle. We will only publish one of these.
I find Family Chronicle magazine to be very helpful
for resources and new trends and ideas in genealogy. Personally,
I find that when I receive an issue of the magazine, it is
a shot in the arm to keep charging ahead in my search. I have
very common names to research and have hit the brick wall
many times. Your magazine always gives me renewed energy to
keep going and I have been successful because of it. Thanks.
This article originally appeared in our November/December
2001 issue.
|